The problem of getting a system to pursue what we actually intend, rather than a proxy that merely correlates with it.
Tuning a model using human preference comparisons, so it produces the kind of answer people actually rate highly.
Also known as: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
A pre-trained language model predicts plausible text, which is not the same as being helpful, honest or safe. RLHF closes that gap by collecting human comparisons — shown two responses, which is better? — training a reward model to predict those preferences, and then optimising the language model against that reward model.
It is the step that turns a raw next-token predictor into something you would ship. It also inherits the taste and blind spots of whoever provided the comparisons, and over-optimising against a reward model produces answers that score well while getting worse — reward hacking.
The problem of getting a system to pursue what we actually intend, rather than a proxy that merely correlates with it.
When a model states something false with the same fluency and confidence it uses for things that are true.
Definitions are reviewed by our editorial team. Spotted a problem? Tell us.